<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hapless at seA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skeps.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skeps.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>the inquiries and diatribes of an insecure autodidact.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:34:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='skeps.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://skeps.wordpress.com/osd.xml" title="Hapless at seA" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://skeps.wordpress.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>(Forthcoming) A Blatant Petitio Principii: Why Critiques of Perspectivism as Viciously Self-referential Are, Themselves, Problematically Circular.</title>
		<link>http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/12/17/forthcoming-a-blatant-petitio-principii-why-viciously-self-referential-critiques-of-perspectivism-are-themselves-problematically-circular/</link>
		<comments>http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/12/17/forthcoming-a-blatant-petitio-principii-why-viciously-self-referential-critiques-of-perspectivism-are-themselves-problematically-circular/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 18:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>skeps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/12/17/forthcoming-a-blatant-petitio-principii-why-viciously-self-referential-critiques-of-perspectivism-are-themselves-problematically-circular/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=skeps.wordpress.com&amp;blog=734789&amp;post=13&amp;subd=skeps&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/12/17/forthcoming-a-blatant-petitio-principii-why-viciously-self-referential-critiques-of-perspectivism-are-themselves-problematically-circular/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b865339eb9aa644d22be2b74f817e694?s=96&#38;d=identicon" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">skeps</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>(Forthcoming) Being, Becoming, and Time: Parmenides&#8217; Influence Accompanies All Metaphysics</title>
		<link>http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/12/17/forthcoming-being-becoming-and-time-parmenides-accompanies-all-metaphysics/</link>
		<comments>http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/12/17/forthcoming-being-becoming-and-time-parmenides-accompanies-all-metaphysics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>skeps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/12/17/forthcoming-being-becoming-and-time-parmenides-accompanies-all-metaphysics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=skeps.wordpress.com&amp;blog=734789&amp;post=12&amp;subd=skeps&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/12/17/forthcoming-being-becoming-and-time-parmenides-accompanies-all-metaphysics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b865339eb9aa644d22be2b74f817e694?s=96&#38;d=identicon" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">skeps</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Definition: Nietzsche and Others</title>
		<link>http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/on-definition-nietzsche-and-others/</link>
		<comments>http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/on-definition-nietzsche-and-others/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 07:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>skeps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Emil Cioran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friedreich Nietzsche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilles Deleuze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perspectivism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/on-definition-nietzsche-and-others/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Definition: Nietzsche and Others &#160; We define only out of despair, we must have a formula&#8230; to give a facade to the void. -Emil Cioran In the middle of the 2nd essay in Genealogy of Morals, Nietzsche takes on the question of human punishment. He goes to great lengths to distinguish between the origins [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=skeps.wordpress.com&amp;blog=734789&amp;post=11&amp;subd=skeps&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/on-definition-nietzsche-and-others/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b865339eb9aa644d22be2b74f817e694?s=96&#38;d=identicon" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">skeps</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Schopenhauer&#8217;s Critique of Kant (II): The &#8220;Ding an Sich&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/06/29/forthcoming-schopenhauers-critique-of-kant-ii-the-ding-an-sich/</link>
		<comments>http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/06/29/forthcoming-schopenhauers-critique-of-kant-ii-the-ding-an-sich/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 01:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>skeps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arthur Schopenhauer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immanuel Kant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/06/29/forthcoming-schopenhauers-critique-of-kant-ii-the-ding-an-sich/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In continuing my expositions regarding Schopenhauer’s critique of Kant I now turn to Schopenhauer’s reading of, and terse polemic against, Kant’s ambivalent concept of the &#8220;ding an sich”, or “thing[s]” in itself. If Schopenhauer’s understanding of this gnomic Kantian concept is correct – and this is by no means indubitably the case – then his [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=skeps.wordpress.com&amp;blog=734789&amp;post=9&amp;subd=skeps&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/06/29/forthcoming-schopenhauers-critique-of-kant-ii-the-ding-an-sich/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b865339eb9aa644d22be2b74f817e694?s=96&#38;d=identicon" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">skeps</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pontifications on the Great Project</title>
		<link>http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/06/27/pontifications-on-the-great-project/</link>
		<comments>http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/06/27/pontifications-on-the-great-project/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 23:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>skeps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Friedreich Nietzsche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georges Bataille]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilles Deleuze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wallace Stevens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/06/27/pontifications-on-the-great-project/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Originally posted in a thread on the Galilean Forums here: http://www.galilean-library.org/academy/viewtopic.php?p=20475#20475 It would be good to read the opening post to orient oneself before reading my reply.)  The terse proclamation that “all thought is anthropomorphic” stands as a singular, and thereby comparatively less vivid, echo of the voice of the viruses that spawned with philosophy. [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=skeps.wordpress.com&amp;blog=734789&amp;post=7&amp;subd=skeps&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/06/27/pontifications-on-the-great-project/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b865339eb9aa644d22be2b74f817e694?s=96&#38;d=identicon" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">skeps</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opening: The Pursuit of Sexual Pleasure in Bataille&#8217;s &#8220;Story of the Eye&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/06/13/forthcoming-bataille-opening-and-sex-in-story-of-the-eye/</link>
		<comments>http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/06/13/forthcoming-bataille-opening-and-sex-in-story-of-the-eye/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>skeps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Georges Bataille]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Story of the Eye]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/06/13/forthcoming-bataille-opening-and-sex-in-story-of-the-eye/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Abstract: A short essay in progress on Bataille&#8217;s conceptions of &#8220;intentionality, violence, exploration, chaos, novelty, death, and opening&#8221; in The Story of the Eye. I propose that Bataille&#8217;s explanations of sex tacitly and subtly point to an integral phenomena that I will call &#8220;opening&#8221;. Some of my explications, elaborations, and interpretations. Opening; The Pursuit of [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=skeps.wordpress.com&amp;blog=734789&amp;post=6&amp;subd=skeps&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/06/13/forthcoming-bataille-opening-and-sex-in-story-of-the-eye/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b865339eb9aa644d22be2b74f817e694?s=96&#38;d=identicon" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">skeps</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Schopenhauer&#8217;s Critique of Kant (I): Transcendental Aspects of Perception</title>
		<link>http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/05/28/also-forthcoming-schopenhauer/</link>
		<comments>http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/05/28/also-forthcoming-schopenhauer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 18:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>skeps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arthur Schopenhauer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immanuel Kant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/05/28/also-forthcoming-schopenhauer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Abstract: An explication of Schopenhauer&#8217;s diagnosis vis a vis Kant&#8217;s &#8220;great mistake&#8221;: his conflation of abstract and empirical elements of the mind &#8211;or operations of the brain, as Schopenhauer would see it&#8211; in reference to the greater concept of perception. I will be looking at a section of Schopenhauer&#8217;s Appendix of the World as Will [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=skeps.wordpress.com&amp;blog=734789&amp;post=4&amp;subd=skeps&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/05/28/also-forthcoming-schopenhauer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b865339eb9aa644d22be2b74f817e694?s=96&#38;d=identicon" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">skeps</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forthcoming &#8211; Nietzsche, Anderson, and Perspectivism</title>
		<link>http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/05/11/forthcoming/</link>
		<comments>http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/05/11/forthcoming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 06:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>skeps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Friedreich Nietzsche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perspectivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/05/11/forthcoming/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Summary and Evaluation of R. Lanier Anderson&#8217;s Defense of Fritzean Perspectivism.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=skeps.wordpress.com&amp;blog=734789&amp;post=3&amp;subd=skeps&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/05/11/forthcoming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b865339eb9aa644d22be2b74f817e694?s=96&#38;d=identicon" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">skeps</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wordsworth’s Leech-gatherer: Stoicism in Resolution and Independence</title>
		<link>http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/hello-world/</link>
		<comments>http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/hello-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 02:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>skeps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resolution and Independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stoicism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wordsworth’s Leech-gatherer: Stoicism in Resolution and Independence In the Preface to Lyrical Ballads Wordsworth meets the question of “what” a poet is by placing her/him directly and inextricably within the context of the world. A poet sees “man and the objects that surround him as acting and re-acting upon each other … He considers man [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=skeps.wordpress.com&amp;blog=734789&amp;post=1&amp;subd=skeps&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://skeps.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/hello-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b865339eb9aa644d22be2b74f817e694?s=96&#38;d=identicon" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">skeps</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
